Yes, cause I'm sick of my work being ripped. My watermark is little and it's as much a name tag as an anti-ripping device cause if people really want to use someone else's art for something, they'll find some way to do it.
I voted that i don't use, but i see a lot of people using it without any sense. blurry pictures, misproportioned frames and some others, that of photo that makes you go "UHHHH, what a f*** is this?!?!?!? I agree on using them if it's a good picture, if others can go on using phototshop or other software to retrieve anything from them. As ~Serenity-Falls says, until they are not on a porn site or other website i don't mind. When that happens and i wasn't informed by the users i think i'll go bezerk....
Yes, because I am tired of seeing my work ripped off and kids building their websites with my stuff. But I never put some ugly, huge watermark all over the place because I know a lot of people have issues with that, and I do too. Especially when the image is already resized down so small for display on dA and there's a HUGE watermark covering the entire thing.
oh i answered wrong i meant to say I HATE THEM!!! it distracts from the work, they look ugly. i'm getting ripped all the time, but i still can't bear to mutilate my work.. i'll just go after them
Devious Comments
I do hate the DA watermark. Its a nice option but I often will not even look if someone has used them. IT distroys the pix for me
As for the watermarks I do use... I find their small size and location give the photo a more professional feel.
I agree on using them if it's a good picture, if others can go on using phototshop or other software to retrieve anything from them.
As ~Serenity-Falls says, until they are not on a porn site or other website i don't mind. When that happens and i wasn't informed by the users i think i'll go bezerk....
V
it distracts from the work, they look ugly. i'm getting ripped all the time, but i still can't bear to mutilate my work.. i'll just go after them